Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M +43%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
12
192
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GF110
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy