Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +500%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G84
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy