Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +42%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK107
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy