Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (62W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +47%
0.48 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK107
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy