Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +1555%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G86
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

62W
TDP
21W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy