Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +2531%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GP102
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy