CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
NVIDIA Tesla K40m
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m
+951%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
VS
Tesla K40m
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK110B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
3
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
4
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
6
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
7
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
8
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
9
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
10
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy