Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050 +114%
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GF100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy