Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000 +159%
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK106
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy