Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (62W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075 +29%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
800W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT200B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy