Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +2793%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GA100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy