Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +376%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy