Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (62W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D +277%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G94
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy