Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +982%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GK110B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy