Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +12675%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
295W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 31
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy