Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1165MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile +894%
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GM204
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy