Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +2779%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
7680
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy