Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +2881%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
46
192
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GA104
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy