Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +2110%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GP100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy