NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
+296%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GM107
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
