NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
+461%
2.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK104
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
