Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
14352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +28279%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
240
Shading Units
14592
40
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
MI300
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
146 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy