Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
14096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +10187%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
14336
40
TMUs
896
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
100 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy