Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +1016%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GM204
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy