Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +145%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G94
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy