Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +14%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK208
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy