Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2097%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
48
240
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
TU104B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy