Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +5374%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GA102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy