Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060 +43%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GT200B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy