Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +810%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
2688
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK110
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy