Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40d to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40d 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Tesla K40d +1068%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK110B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy