Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +3684%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GV100
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy