Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +1200%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GM107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy