NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
A10M
+4723%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
56
256
Shading Units
7168
32
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
