Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +2934%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

142W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy