NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
+50%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
51W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
