NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+2659%
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
8
SM Count
48
256
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
