Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +1677%
8.637 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
256
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
95W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net