NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2844%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
46
256
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
