NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM RTX A5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A5000
+5613%
27.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
64
256
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
230W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
