NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
+709%
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2688
32
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
