NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
+990%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2010
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
256
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU106
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
