Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +2498%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
256
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP102
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy