Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 +3255%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
72
256
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy