Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c +938%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
245W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK180
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy