Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
14144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +16298%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
14336
16
TMUs
896
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy