Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +70%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

38W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy