Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 38W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410 +834%
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

38W
TDP
21W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G86
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy