Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +17564%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
153 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy