Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100 +108%
2.142 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy